Witsberry
ServicesStoriesAbout
Get my free readiness reportFree report
Witsberry

Your CTO execution layer. Fixed-price builds, held to the WB-12 standard, run by us after launch.

Services

  • AI Products & Systems
  • WB-12 Audit & Recovery
  • SaaS Applications
  • Mobile Apps
  • Product Websites
  • RUN: Ongoing Operations

Company

  • About us
  • Case studies
  • Free tools
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact

Office

128 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, United Kingdom

Witsberry Ltd · Company No. 13858949 · Registered in England & Wales · Every certification issued under the WB-12 Standard v1.0

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeServicesWB-12 Audit & Recovery

Most AI-built MVPs collapse the moment real users show up.

WB-12 Audit & Recovery

You built something fast and now you need to know what you're actually holding. The WB-12 audit tells you in 5 days, what's solid, what's fragile, and what it would honestly cost to fix. Recovery scoped after, not before.

50+ products shipped13 years engineeringFour guarantees, in writing

Delivered inside

Built to hold™, fixed at $18,000

See the full program

The problem

Every new feature breaks two old ones.

No one, including the AI, can tell you why. Sound familiar?

01

Every new feature breaks two old ones

No one, including the AI, can tell you why.

02

You're afraid to touch the codebase

Not because it's complex, because it's undocumented and inconsistent.

03

Investors are asking about scale, and you don't have an answer

Due diligence surfaces the debt before you can explain it.

04

You don't know if it's a cleanup job or a rebuild

And every week you wait, the answer skews further toward rebuild.

Same codebase, two futures

Vibe-coded

Rescued

Audit → Triage → Rebuild

Your guide

We've been the senior engineering call on 50+ products, including ones that started as someone else's AI-generated prototype. The read is always the same in the first hour: what's real architecture, and what's pattern-matched scaffolding that happened to run.

More on how we work

Free framework

The AI Rescue Triage

Before we touch a line of code, we run your existing build through this, so you know exactly what's worth saving.

  • Does the core idea have real users, or did the AI build outrun actual demand?
  • Is the data model salvageable, or does every new feature need a workaround?
  • Could a new engineer understand this codebase in a day, or does only the AI (and no one) understand it?
  • Is the technical debt costing you weeks, or is it actively blocking your next raise?
  • Would a scoped rebuild take less time than continuing to patch what exists?
  • Is this still the right product, or did vibe-coding let you skip the harder validation question?

The plan

How we actually do it.

01

Audit first, always

Audit first, always

Full codebase and data review before any code changes. You get the finding in writing.

02

Triage, not opinion

Triage, not opinion

Every module scored salvageable / needs-work / rebuild, with the reasoning shown, not just the verdict.

03

Fixed-price quote, not a blank check

Fixed-price quote, not a blank check

You know the number before you commit to the work.

04

Migrate without downtime

Migrate without downtime

Existing users and data move over live, not during a maintenance window that scares your customers.

What's included

01

Codebase Audit & Triage

A senior CTO review of what's salvageable, what's a liability, and what needs to be rebuilt from scratch.

02

Technical Debt Cleanup

Refactoring AI-generated code into something a real engineering team can actually maintain and extend.

03

Scale-Ready Rebuild

Rebuilding the fragile parts on solid architecture, without throwing out what already works.

50+
Products shipped
13
Years engineering

This is a newer service. No case study here yet. It runs on the same senior judgment behind every other product we've shipped, held to the same WB-12 standard, not a separate, less-vetted process.

See the track record

If nothing changes

The longer it runs, the more it costs to fix

Technical debt compounds. Every sprint spent patching a fragile foundation is a sprint not spent on the audit that would've told you to stop patching three months ago. Founders who wait until a raise or an outage forces the question pay more: in audit scope, in lost time, and in deals that stall because the codebase couldn't survive due diligence.

Common questions

In most cases, yes. We audit first to tell you honestly whether it's a cleanup job or a rebuild, before you spend another dollar patching it.

No, AI tools are how most founders should start. The problem isn't using them, it's not knowing when to stop and bring in real engineering judgment.

We'll tell you straight if that's the case, and what a scoped rebuild costs, not padded by 'fixing' a codebase that should be replaced.

Yes, migration without downtime or data loss is standard scope, not an add-on.

Other ways we help

AI Products & Systems

AI workflows and agents built around tasks that happen at real volume and save real hours, or we tell you it's not worth building yet. Every integration ships with audit trails and usage logging built in.

Learn more

SaaS Applications

Multi-tenant SaaS platforms architected for the users you have today, and built so your first external customer can onboard without touching the codebase. Priced on value, not seats.

Learn more

Mobile Apps (iOS + Android)

Production-ready iOS and Android apps built for retention, not just a listing in the App Store.

Learn more

Ready to build something that holds?

Start with the free WB-12 readiness audit. No call required, and you keep the report either way.

Get my free readiness report